IDLE incentives distribution update III

Author

Treasury League

Background

Summary

A proposal to discuss the next steps of the $IDLE incentivization, aka the Liquidity Mining program, on Best Yield strategies ending in April 2023.

Rationale

And later with IIP-31 until April 2023

We will then analyze how the program performed at this new distribution rate and list some incentivization proposals for the future.

To be complete, we need to remember that the DAO treasury manages these two funds for incentivization purposes:

Performance analysis

For an analysis focused on the governance participation among IDLE token holders, we refer to the one done in August 2022. We do not expect to see significant drifts from the trend seen given the extended bear market conditions affecting the crypto ecosystem.

It can still be interesting to see how the financial performances of the LM program evolved since the last analysis.

Financial analysis

To understand the financial performance of the incentives program, it can be useful to understand the dollar cost, aka the acquisition cost, of the fees generated by the Idle strategies for every $IDLE incentive distributed.

How many fees were generated by the Idle strategies vs the $ amount of IDLE distributed?

We have already analysed two different distribution periods:

  • Distribution 1 from 01/01/2021 until 08/06/2022 with 3,205 IDLE/day
  • Distribution 2 from 08/07/2022 until 12/31/2022 with 1,990 IDLE/day

Today we will add a third part

  • Distribution 3 from 01/30/2023 until 13/03/2023 with 500 IDLE/day

image

Distribution 3

The Best Yield strategy received around 21k $IDLE incentives, i.e. 47% of the funds, (for an average dollar value of $9k with IDLE price equal to $0.42) and generated around $22k in fees for the DAO.

  • For every $1 spent in $IDLE incentives, the BY strategies generated $2.49 in fees

These results seem to suggest that the incentivization program for Best Yield is strategic and helped retain the TVL. We should anyway weigh this analysis taking into consideration its short length. Due to the Euler exploit happened on March 13th, multiple strategies were paused. Hence the the analyis lasts only ~40 days.

Proposals

We will list three ideas as next steps for the Liquidity Mining program:

1. Continue the Liquidity Mining program for 3 months

The Best Yield strategy has been incentivised through the Liquidity Mining program with different distribution rates (3205 โ†’ 2215 โ†’ 1000 โ†’ 500 IDLE/Day). One option is to extend for another 3 months the program at the same distribution rate.

  • 500 IDLE/day for the next 3 months

The IDLE needed to fund this extension can be taken from the Ecosystem fund.

Extending the incentivization length of the LM program can be strategically smart to retain the current liquidity (mainly sitting in the DAI, USDC and USDT BY markets). Even more, now that the Best Yield and the Yield Tranches strategies can work synergetically.

This emission rate would not affect the rewards return for the BY strategy (+0.2% at current prices).

2. Continue the Liquidity Mining program for 3 months and update the distribution rate

Another option is to extend for another 3 months program but adjust its distribution rate.

  • From 500 to 250 IDLE/day for the next 3 months

The IDLE needed to fund this extension can be taken from the Ecosystem fund.

This emission rate would affect minimally the rewards return for the BY strategy (+0.1% at current prices).

3. Pause the Liquidity Mining distribution

One last option is to pause the Liquidity Mining program.

  • From 500 to 0 IDLE/day

From a DAO treasury perspective, this option would stop emission of IDLE and reduce significantly the selling pressure on the DAO governance token. The emission rate would affect the rewards return for the BY strategy and stakers.

It is important to remember that the Liquidity Mining program started in November 2020 with different rate of distributions and strategies affected.

The DAO may also think to update the Integration Partners program and create ad-hoc solution for integrators that count on the additional return given by IDLE on the Idle strategies.

Next steps

We would like to gather the sentiment of Idle DAO toward these proposals:

  1. Continue the Liquidity Mining program for 3 months at a 500 IDLE/day
  2. Continue the Liquidity Mining program for 3 months at a 250 IDLE/day
  3. Pause the Liquidity Mining program

This post will be open for discussion and in less than 24 hours, if there are no objections, we will proceed with the Temperature Check.

โ€”
* For a matter of clarity, in this analysis, we are showing daily distribution rates. $IDLE incentives distribution happens instead on a per-block basis, hence some rounding has been applied.

** In this analysis we used average YTD prices such as IDLE = $0.42, WETH = $1,643.

3 Likes

Temperature check voting

The voting phase to decide how to continue the Liquidity Mining program starts now :ballot_box:

  • Proposal 1 - Extend the Liquidity Mining program for 3 months at 500 IDLE/day
  • Proposal 2 - Extend the Liquidity Mining program for 3 months at 250 IDLE/day
  • Proposal 3 - Pause the Liquidity Mining program

:arrow_right: Poll for $IDLE holders: HERE
:arrow_right: Poll for $IDLE stakers (stkIDLE holders): HERE

:alarm_clock: Polls will close on 2023-04-23T17:00:00Z

The final $IDLE voting weights will be calculated using the approved calculator .

Looking to delegate your vote on Snapshot? Follow the official Snapshot guide.

Let your vote count! :writing_hand:

2 Likes

Gm everyone!

The Bocconi Students Blockchain Association has decided to vote in favor of proposal 2 and we would like to present our thought process so the members of this DAO can better come to a consensus on this matter.

On the one hand, we felt like the current incentives do not make enough of a difference in yields to where it justifies an emission rate that has such a profound, medium-term effect on the price due to low liquidity in a comatose market.

If the DAO saves on some $IDLE now to improve short-term tokenomics, it would allow/increase the likelihood that $IDLE can bounce back in a market that seems like it may continue its upswing. That means that in the future if $IDLE can bounce back, it would have a greater effect on yields since its Dollar value is now higher, which would actually make an impact on user decisions regarding depositing.

On the other hand, completely removing incentives is a negative signal to LPs, especially at such a crucial team after the Euler exploit. It is not a great look to completely abolish a liquidity mining program in this state of the market after having had it for such a long time. Also, reducing incentives, but not removing them entirely comes with the benefit that the DAO can test the effect of incentives on deposits, so it could be an insightful exercise that may provide valuable lessons for later.

Thus, we have decided to vote for reduced $IDLE incentives.

4 Likes

Temperature check results

Temperature Check passed :white_check_mark:

The DAO shared its preferences regarding the next step of the IDLE incentives distributions preferring

  • Proposal 2 - Extend the Liquidity Mining program for 3 months at 250 IDLE/day

2 Likes